Download file to see previous pages...
Socrates was more specific about the commitments of a human towards the state (Socrates). He has argued that the state has the most importance than anything in the world. Socrates believed that the people should work for the government and their self interests are not much important when compared to the interests of the government or the state. Even the death was considered of least importance while fighting to protect the interest of the sates as per Socrates.
On the other hand, Thoreau was not much adamant about the commitment of the people towards the government or the state (Richardson). He believed that the people have another life apart from the life for government. In his opinion, doing everything as the government directs may not be a wise act for the people. In his opinion, the governments are responsible for so many evil things in the society like slavery and wars and there is no point in sacrificing the life for the interests of the government. Thoreau believed that a person’s life has lot of dimensions and its commitment towards the state is only one among them. Socrates believed that the government is responsible for giving better living standards to the people whereas Thoreau believed that the government denying it.
Both Socrates and Thoreau have some similarities also in their views. Both of them believed in morality. Thoreau said that people, if left to their own ends will act justly, and should be treated accordingly by the law (Richardson). Socrates also said the same thing that "no one wants to commit injustice" for its own sake, many people end up doing so anyway (Socrates). Socrates argued that the people have a moral responsibility to abide by the state laws in response to the protection provided to the people by the states. Socrates has given more importance to the consciousness of in individual while obeying the laws. He has pointed out that the people can avoid laws if they feel injustice in it. Thoreau also more or less
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
His views were seen to be taken up by his followers, some of whom were guilty of treason, profanation and tyranny. His religious opinions were perceived to challenge the traditional order, and in the popular consciousness he became associated with the decay of established morality brought about by the educational revolution of the Sophists.
All religions teach welfare and betterment of humanity. Yet their followers have created certain differences which have been magnified in the name of religions and this act has separated and divided humanity into various factions and sects. Christianity and Buddhism are two big religions of the world.
Personal Essay: Where Am I Now? Renee Manheimer Name of University Personal Essay: Where Am I Now? Personal and Professional Information My name is Renee Manheimer and I an originally from Lima, Peru. I grew up very poor in an orphanage in Peru. When I was old enough, I put myself through college.
Where Burgers are Smashed Burger is one of America’s favorite foods for many years now because it is a complete meal in itself, readily available in almost every corner one turns to. Restaurants and fast-food serve the victual so that there should be no extraordinary thing about it.
Explain graphically and verbally what happens to the market in the short run and in the new long-run equilibrium if factor prices and demand are assumed to remain the same as before. Hint: You have to use two parallel diagrams, one for an individual (representative) firm and one for the industry.
Dubai My personality is attributable to the places where I have spent my life over the precedent years. During my upbringing, I had the opportunity to live in different places across the globe owing to the professional career orientation of my father. I have travelled and lived in three continents across the world.
6) describes globalization as those processes that produce interactions and disjuncture between different cultures. From these descriptions, it is safe to suggest that globalization results in both homogenization and heterogenization of culture. It represents a dialectical process, which can both integrate and fragment thereby creating both winners and losers, depending on circumstances that prevail.
The author states that what many people do not realize is that students with English as their second language have to use other ways of learning English that natural English speakers. According to Yau-hau Tse “students used six dimensions of language learning strategies: cognitive, social, association, and constructive strategies”
These are the same ideas, which were started by an organization known as the “Venus project”; it proposed a plan of action for social change the change was to work towards a peaceful and sustainable global civilization. This paper draws its thesis
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy. Comapare Socrates and Thoreau's methods, beleifs. Show where they are the same and where and why they differ for FREE!