Nobody downloaded yet

Introduction philosophy - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
(p51) Explain the implications this quotation has on the existentialist understanding of human nature and the nature of vale.
In his…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.8% of users find it useful
Introduction philosophy
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Introduction philosophy"

Download file to see previous pages One of the critical condemnations of Existentialism has been that it is so much atheistic that the existentialists argue that God does not exist in the world. However, Sartre convincingly purports that existentialism is simply not that, and it is important to realize that, according to the existentialists, it does not matter if God exists or not. “Existentialism,” Sartre makes clear, “is nothing else than an attempt to draw all the consequences of a coherent atheistic position. It isn’t trying to plunge man into despair at all… Existentialism isn’t so atheistic that it wears itself out showing that God doesn’t exist. Rather, it declares that even if God did exist, that would change nothing. There you’ve got our point of view.” (Sartre, 51) According to him, it does not mean that the existentialists believe that God exists, but rather they think that the problem of the existence God is not the issue here. Therefore, it is important to realize existentialism as optimistic and as a doctrine of action. It is also fundamental to distinguish between the despair of the Christians and that of the existentialists, and the arguments of Sartre have great implications with regard to the existentialist understanding of human nature and the nature of vale.
One of the basic arguments of the existentialists has been that there is no human nature, in view of the fact that there is no God to conceive it and the philosophy of Sartre should be realized as an attempt to draw all the consequences of a coherent atheistic position. Therefore, the quotation given here has great implication in realizing the fundamental philosophy of the existentialists with regard to the nature of human beings. Existentialism has been charged with dwelling on human degradation and neglecting the gracious and beautiful, the bright side of human nature. However, Sartre offers a convincing explanation of how ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Introduction philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Introduction philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561009-introduction-philosophy
(Introduction Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Introduction Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561009-introduction-philosophy.
“Introduction Philosophy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1561009-introduction-philosophy.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Introduction philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy I

...?Muhammad Naeem 01 May, Philosophy and Science Generally when it comes to philosophy, people think that it must be something boring and incomprehensible. But philosophy is something very simple and deals with basic questions of the life. These questions include ‘existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language’ (Teichmann 1) (Grayling 2). Although these questions are plain and general but their answers are way too difficult and important. They have confused many a man. A philosophical question is concerned with comparing things and asks about ‘goods and bads’ of the choices. But science generally propounds questions which are concerned with how things work. An answer is deemed...
1 Pages(250 words)Book Report/Review

Introduction to Philosophy

...?Introduction to Philosophy What criticism did Kant bring against Descartes’ view of consciousness or the self? Whose view do you find most acceptable, Descartes or Kant’s?  Descartes’ views of consciousness represent our true or inner self. The Cartesian skepticism is the subject of Kant’s critique. According to desecrates representation, our subjectivity seems to be independent and sufficient. Desecrate indicate our experiences and thought as absolute truths. According to desecrates the aspect of rationality is the pillar of philosophy. Descartes argued that concepts of things is analytical, he proposes his method of hyperbolic doubt. He continues to argue that this method is sufficient...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

INTRODUCTION TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY

...Introduction to Western Philosophy What is philosophy is? Is normally viewed as a reflective question in the threefold sagacity. According to Russell (20), philosophy tackles the issue of fundamental questions that underlie day-day-perceptions. Philosophic questions obtain distinct answers across history, the cognitive endeavor of philosophizing is not needless. Philosophy is quite a hypothetical than dynamic activity. It seeks to establish some inter-theoretical techniques of questioning truth and find the principles of proof and standards for assessing our beliefs, perceptions and arguments. It targets at cogent understanding and utilizes discursive...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

INTRODUCTION TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY

...?5) Nietzsche argues against philosophy and reason. What is his view? Why was Socrates a mistake? Why are ethics, religion, law, and democracy mistakes? Why must the superman have complete freedom? Does Nietzsche have a methodology to help derive his view? Do you think Nietzsche is right or wrong? Explain and justify your view. Nietzsche’s view against philosophy and reason derives from his views of the current western philosophical tradition, as organized around a conception of philosophy deriving from Socrates. He was against philosophy and reason in the Socratic sense, which viewed philosophy, which aims for knowledge of timeless and non-empirical...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Introduction to philosophy

...? INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY The contributions that Descartes, Hume to philosophy The 17th and 18th century philosophers had enormous contributions to philosophy and they include Hume, Kant, and Descartes among others. This discussion will outline Hume and Descartes contribution to philosophy. The two are modern philosophers and their ideas lay a foundation to much human thought and examine the modern thought as they have developed a unique philosophy that extends to both rationalism and empiricism worlds. Examining both Hume and Descartes contributions to philosophy shows their critical contribution to the foundation of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Philosophy - Introduction to Ethics

...married, and being a good citizen, this officer’s family was suffering from his death. Everyone who participated in this crime needed to pay for the price of this man’s life, not just the one who shot him. Susan Ann Power received a balanced sentence of eight to twelve years. She proved that she would not continue in criminal activity. Power proved that she could become a law abiding citizen. Although she deserved to pay for her crime, her up standing life should have been taken into account as well. People labeled Bentham’s theory of the good life as “the pig philosophy”, because Bentham’s felt there were only two true mediums; pleasure and pain. He felt that the good is whatever brings the greatest happiness. ...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Philosophy - Introduction to Ethics

...1. Immanuel Kant was one of the greatest philosophers of the modern world. Kant’s philosophy is based on rational principles. Most of his philosophical theories are stated in his books The Metaphysics of Morals and Critique of Practical Reason. He considered that as human beings endowed with reason; mankind could make and act on decisions that have pure rational background. Such acts could be held to be universally true. Due to their rationality such acts yielded complete happiness. According to Kant only perfect duty held unconditional moral worth. The moral duty has to be based on power of rationality endowed by the nature itself. Thus moral duty has intrinsic moral worth in itself. This is derived from a priori laws...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Introduction to Philosophy I

...with Sartre that we must take full responsibility of the freedom we enjoy. The search for our own essence should be guided by a firm set of values. One implication I see in this kind of philosophy is the attainment of power for an individual. If we believe that there is no one above us (eg. God) and that we make our own destiny, then we are empowered to explore for ourselves the world, its meaning, and our existence. A negative implication I see in this philosophy is the lack of something to hold on to when all else fails. The lack of a higher order, a God perhaps, takes away the meaning of life. I don’t think philosophy can provide ‘final answers’ to the ‘final questions’. I think...
1 Pages(250 words)Book Report/Review

Introduction to Philosophy

..., but this is an incomplete assurance. If a hill appears to be brown from afar but becomes green due to many grasses when seen closely, one’s sureness about its actual color becomes unsure. Plato argues that although believing depends on seeing it is still in the level of opinion. Plato believes that higher education is a means to break away from the walls of appearances by guiding and educating the mind in moral philosophy and mathematics. Plato also believes that the lower part of the intelligible domain holds the topic of mathematics. The mental state is ‘dianoia’, which means ‘thinking’, meaning an incomplete level of knowledge. This mental state is seen in the scientist, because the scientist examines seeable...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Introduction to philosophy

...The Concept of Arche in Ancient Greek Philosophy From Greek mythology, the first philosophers of Greeceinherited the problem of arche – the ultimate beginning or a principle that structures the whole world (Curd). Rather, they have inherited certain ideas about the first elements that in a new, philosophical context became a problem since they were the subject of discussion. Various pre-Socratics (i.e. philosophers who developed their theories before the appearance of the Socratic concept) offered their first elements, making their concept different from each other. Within the Milesian school, the arche was conceived as apeiron, from which the variety of things arises. It was believed that “neither water nor any other of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Introduction philosophy for FREE!

Contact Us