Nobody downloaded yet

What are the main differences between contract and tort - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
In attempting to draw a comparative analysis between a contract and tort law, it is imperative to begin by highlighting the definitions of the two terms so as to gain a clear understanding of the difference between them. Different cases will also be cited to amply demonstrate…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.9% of users find it useful
What are the main differences between contract and tort
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "What are the main differences between contract and tort"

Download file to see previous pages A contract can be in verbal or written form but the most important thing is that there would be an agreement especially between two parties. On the other hand, a tort law can be described as a civil wrong not arising from a contract and in the case of negligence, one should owe due consideration to one’s neighbour (Capiro Industries vs. Dickman 1990).
According to the European labour laws, both the worker and the employee are bound by certain statutory regulations that would ensure that no party will breach the agreed contract. With regards to employment contracts, there ought to be written agreement which binds the two parties to honour their contractual obligations which can be enforceable in the court of law should one party defaults. Thus, as noted, a contract can be loosely defined as an agreement between two parties and these can be individuals or even organisations. One peculiar aspect of a contract is that one party offers to do
In a contract, there is an agreement of offer and acceptance between two parties concerned and should any party defaults, then it is called breach of contract. It is against this background that the court of law intervenes to ensure that justice prevails so as to avoid unfavorable gain by another party on behalf of the other. Basically, the court would come in so as to protect the interests of the consumer or the second party especially in the case where there is bargaining of powers. Consumers in most cases are not choosers of the terms by which they would be bound in a contract hence the intervention of the courts.
Thus, it can be noted that contracts are especially concerned with the enforcement of bargains. This is aptly shown in the case of Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls Contractors Ltd [1990] 1 All ER 512. Whilst Williams has been subcontracted and a payment of 20 000 pounds promised to be paid in installments, the contract was however silent on the period and ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“What are the main differences between contract and tort Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(What Are the Main Differences Between Contract and Tort Essay)
“What Are the Main Differences Between Contract and Tort Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What are the main differences between contract and tort

The main differences between conventional bank and Islamic bank

...?Qatar Islamic Bank and Doha Bank: Differences between their Balance Sheets: Balance Sheet The asset category of both Qatar Islamic Bank and Doha Bank resemble where their sub-categories are concerned. The balance sheet representation of asses in both banks begins with cash balances in the respective banks. As of year ending December 2010, Qatar Islamic Bank claimed 1,874, 550 Qatari Riyaals while Doha Bank claimed around 10, 378, 704 Qatarri Riyals. Both amounts were expressed in Qattari Riyyals for both banks. Both banks show amount due from investments, loans and financing Activities after showing relative cash balances. Even this is unchanged in the asset category. All assets including fixed assets and other assets are summed... while...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Contract and tort

...the absence of concurrent liability, it may not be possible to obtain compensation for damage. Such failure would be unaffected by whether the claim was based on tort law or contract law. This makes a strident call for a common standard to be implemented. Finally, a common standard is desirable, because in reality, the courts in general, do not strictly apply the difference in tort and contract. This difference is clearly depicted in theory and not in what obtains in practice. A civil jury is conspicuous by its more or less general absence in the UK.20 This requires the presiding judge to precisely describe issues related to remoteness...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Discuss the main procedural differences between criminal and civil trials

... governing the series of proceeding through which the government enforces substantive criminal law. Each municipalities, federal government and state have their own criminal codes defining types of conduct that constitute crimes. In Scotland, law is divided into two main categories, that is, civil law and criminal law. Civil law speaks about the rights and obligations of organisations and individuals. It is a principle that was adopted from Roman law. Civil Law aims to sort out problems and arguments between individuals and other organisations. Criminal Law is the primary means by which the government discovers and criminalizes behaviour that is regarded wrong and damaging to a person s or society as a whole. Criminal law system... that the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

What are the Main Differences Between Liberal and Radical Feminism

...What are the main differences between liberal and radical feminism' Feminism has been one of the most important social movements that have emerged in the modern times. The study behind this phenomenon has been turned into a major field as scholars from many disciplines and in many countries have sought to explore the ways in which women's oppression has been studied, analyzed, discussed, then resisted these past years. Until quite recently, feminist discussion and debate was seen as spasmodic and fragmentary, at least until the mid-nineteenth century, and then as going into abeyance after the First World War. (Caine 1997, p.1) Today, the case is different because one...
8 Pages(2000 words)Article

Contract Law and Tort Law

.... As per doctrine of privity of contract, the courts have held that a person who is not a party to the contract or in other words a third party was not protected by an exclusion clause in that contract, even if the clause purported to extend to him. The four main goals of tort law are to obtain compensation for victims of personal injury, to legally obligate the person who harmed the victim to pay punitive damages, to prevent the recurrence of similar reckless or negligent action in the future and to defend the victims' legal rights. A tort of negligence claims that the defendant is to blame for the victim's personal injury because he...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

Contract and Tort

..."Because contract was traditionally seen as the method for resolving disputes involving pure economic loss, it was originally thought that where two parties had made a contract, a negligence action could not be used to fill in any gaps in that contract" How has Tort overcome the restrictions involved in a strict reading of the law of Contract The law of torts developed out of court decisions in providing remedies where there are no remedies available in any statutory law enacted by the legislation. In the beginning of law where disputes arise between parties the courts use to see whether there is any remedy for the...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical imperatives

...Ethics Exam 2 Q What are the main differences between hypothetical and categorical imperatives Why does Kant claim that the moral law can only be expressed in the form of a categorical imperative Is Kant right Explain. In reference to Immanuel Kant's work, both hypothetical and categorical imperatives have been immensely and clearly differentiated. To start with, hypothetical imperatives are considered as instructions which direct one to act in a certain manner or way so as to achieve a desired result. For instance, if one considers owning an expensive car, then he or she must search for a good paying job to contribute in coming up with the funds. In most instances, hypothetical...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

I have placed the title in the assighnment criteria below

...Contract Law and Tort Law The Law of Contracts, the Law of Torts, and the Law of Restitution are considered as the three main pillars of the English law pertaining to civil liabilities. The Law of Contract is related to the enforcement of exchange transactions, the Law of Torts is concerned with the imposition of certain acceptable standards of behavior, which may be or may not be linked with transaction exchange, while the Law of Restitution deals with parties which get unjustly enriched at the cost of another. Richard Stone (2002, p.11) states ‘The difference between contract, tort and restitution is sometimes said to be based on the nature of the remedies available in relation to each, and in particular the measure of damages... laws. ...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Main differences between perfect competition and monopoly market structures

...Main differences between perfect competition and monopoly market structures Perfect competition The market structures that have perfect competition has many competitors who are close competitors and sets the stage for perfect competition. The perfect competition is a healthy competitive scenario for the market and its buyers. The scenario of perfect competition is such that no player has the power to fix the price of the products in the market. The perfectly competitive market structure is very difficult to achieve and is, therefore, compared as the benchmark for other forms of market structure. The characteristic features of a perfectly competitive market includes the availability of...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Main differences between perfect competition and monopoly market structures

...Main Differences between Perfect Competition and Monopoly Market Structures Perfect Competition Perfect competition refers to a market structure where buyers and sellers are many and are knowledgeable making any element f a monopoly not be in existence hence prices of commodities cannot be controlled by either the sellers or buyers (Marshall, 2007). Perfect competition firms are more than one, and because of this, the products they offer are identical despite the fact that they operate independently. Firms that are perfectly competitive have many competitors because they offer almost the same products. These market structures have no barriers to entry, that is in case other firms that are...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic What are the main differences between contract and tort for FREE!

Contact Us