Nobody downloaded yet

Brief Case analysis - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The junior Varsity crew continuously beat the Varsity boat during the practice. Why does Varsity side constantly to the Junior Varsity team? Other questions that arise include…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
Brief Case analysis
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Brief Case analysis"

Download file to see previous pages Switching cannot be done since Varsity team had an unblemished and recognized physical gain over Junior Varsity boat and could still beat the Junior Varsity team. An essential issue arises as Varsity boat is decelerating down because of employing individuals in the boats.
A fundamental query worth noting is whether this was an obligatory undertaking and why it had to happen. No one was a leading light while several others were team disrupters. Rowing on the water as a team is yet another question that arises. What should the two teams do about it? Finally the last issue that arises is whether the army crew team can be likened to an organizational team. The answer is certainly no due to incapability to substitute hastily each of the team members.
A good decision needs to be made by evaluating the situation at hand, assessing the different options available and coming up or deciding on a solution that will affect the long-term performance of both teams in a positive way. In regard to promoting junior team to a varsity team, one crucial question arises that needs to be addressed i.e. whether this will have an effect on the performance of the team as a whole and whether the all the junior varsity team members qualify to join the varsity team. Making a wrong decision can heavily impact negatively on the performance of the crew and as a result, special attention has to be given when deciding on this option. The junior team members cannot be promoted to Varsity team.
Keeping the members in their original teams and trying to intervene to improve on the performance of both teams seems pleasant as it ensures that both teams add in serious effort towards attaining their key goals and objectives. When it comes to switching a small number of team members of each group, a significant question has to be taken into consideration before making the step i.e. which ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Brief Case analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Brief Case analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1624347-brief-case-analysis
(Brief Case Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Brief Case Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/1624347-brief-case-analysis.
“Brief Case Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1624347-brief-case-analysis.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Brief Case analysis

Organizational Change Vision Analysis (Of a Supplied Brief Case Study)

...was unable to resonate or connect with the people for whom it was intended. The company’s aspirations and directions were embedded in “The customer defines a job well done” and “Invent different ways of working” but these are also vague mission statements. It does not indicate who the customers are and does not clarify the ways of working that would be suitable to the customers. Lessons learned This analysis has made me realize the difference between vision and mission and the importance of these two in strategic planning. This case study also highlights the importance of organizational culture in the change process. Leadership is essential but the leadership should not merely focus on the outcome. The...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Case Brief

...CASE BRIEF: BARBARA A. BOTIS v. E OF GARY A. KUDRICK FACTS: Plaintiff, Barbara A. Botis filed a complaint against the E of Gary A. Kudrick in attempt to receive palimony. Plaintiff argues that her and Kudrick were in a “marriage-type relationship” before his death, and, therefore, has rights to palimony in the form of his two residences and other compensation. Defendant denies that they were ever in such as relationship and motions to dismiss her complaint along with issuing counterclaims against the plaintiff. While the law recognizes the right to palimony for two unmarried individuals who separate, a recent amendment requires the palimony agreement in writing. While the plaintiff does not have her...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Case Brief

...CASE BRIEF CASE ALBION FRANCIS VS NORMAN Y. MINETA; Transport Security Administration. US. October 10, 2007 CASE NO.: 06-1293 U.S Court of appeal Opinion Albion francis, a former federal worker, chose to appeal to the district court’s decision to dismiss his case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.p.12 (b) (1), in which he purports to have been discriminated in employment. Statement of facts. The district court established that the appellant had not consulted all the administrative avenues as required under Title VII and so found the dismissal was warranted. The appellant, however, was discontented with the court’s decision and sort, to appeal to the court of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief

.... District Court’s Ruling and Rationale The ruling by the court was that although learning institutions offered similar training, housing and transportation facilities, having different institutions for white and black children was unfair because it had emotional damages to Black American children (Orlik, 2010). They declared that the decision by the Supreme Court in 1986 was alright and since it only allowed separate institutions for white and black children but with equal facilities, instructors and transportation cost. The bench was undecided as to whether the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause forbid establishment of different learning institutions for white and black children. Case Analysis...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case brief

...Continental Oil Company vs. Occupational safety and Health Review Case brief: The petitioner in this case is continental oil company while the respondent is the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. The petitioner is seeking the United States of Appeals to revert an order issued by the respondent that it desecrated the general clause duty on Occupational safety and Health Act. The commission had ruled that the oil company failed to protect its employees from hazardous incidents, following an explosion that occurred in one of its premises that resulted to the death of three people. However the court of appeal senior judge, Phillips affirmed the decision held by the...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

BRIEF CASE

...Case Brief The Parties Teresa D. Oglesbee is the party appealing to the court of appeal. Teresa is also the plaintiff since she is the party offended. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. is the appellee; Pfeil is also the defendant in the case, Teresa D. Oglesbee v. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. William H. Smith, Jr. represents Teresa and Kurt R. Welterndorf is the representative for Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. in the Court of Appeal. Therefore, Teresa is the plaintiff/appellant and Pfeil is the defendant/appellee. Facts of the Case The case, Teresa D. Oglesbee v. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. is a premises liability case. Teresa D. Oglesbee is the...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

Brief case

... Case Ratcliff v. Sprint Missouri case Case No. WD 64840. Decided in 2008 Summary of the case Bob Ratcliff offers the judgment favoring Sprint Missouri, Sprint United Telephone, in his building risk movement. Mr. Ratcliff raises ten focuses on advance testing the judges’ decision, the trial courts rebuttal to permit him to correct his appeal, the trial courts affirmation or rejection of certain proof, and the trial courts refusal to allow a defensive order. Facts i. On 4th March, 1997, in the Truman structure on the Capitol Complex in Jefferson City. ii. Mr. Ratcliff was the operating in the building as an interchanges admin for the Capitol Police. iii. Sprints administration professional, Jerry Bondurant, was introducing another... that if...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Case brief

...Case brief Affiliation: The case is Mikell v. School Administrative Unit 33, case number 2008-737 which was decided in May 15, 2009, http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nh-supreme-court/1204844.html 2. FACTS Joshua Markiewicz was a seventh grader student who hanged himself. He had been having disciplinary troubles in school which the school counselor was aware of and had informed his mother about some of them. A statement however about him “wanting to blow his brains out” was however termed as not serious by the counselor to his mother and he was made to sign a contract of safety but the matter was never followed again. The mother was suing the school administration including the...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Case Analysis Executive Brief

... Google Case Analysis Google Inc. is faced by three major challenges; increased concerns about privacy from its consumers, continuing to conduct business in China, and sustaining growth of its Android platform. Of the three challenges, how to sustain growth of its Android platform is the most important. However, the most pressing problem that faces Google today is how to sustain the growth of its Android platform. This is because they need to sustain the market growth of Android, monetize mobile computing, gain a competitive edge over Apple, BlackBerry, and Nokia systems, and appease wireless carriers (Hitt et al 167). To solve this problem, it is important for Google to diversify their streams of revenue, as well as continue... ...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study

Case Brief Analysis

...Case Brief Analysis al affiliation Part I Victoria Houlihand v Frank Burns [1971] US District Court for California Facts The plaintiff’s daughter died when her Jeep, which was driven by the defendant, collided with an army tank. Half an hour before the collision, the deceased and the defendant had stopped at a local bar for some drinks and food. Before the break, the deceased had been driving and the defendant took the wheel after the stop. The deceased only allowed the defendant to drive after he had insisted. The main reason of the accident was that the defendant had dozed off and did not awaken in time to avoid colliding with the tanker. The top of the Jeep was covered and the heater...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Brief Case analysis for FREE!

Contact Us