Nobody downloaded yet

A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
 This study discusses is a reconsideration of the court’s rulings in RAV v The City of St. Paul in light of the arguments made by Judith Butler and Matsuda & Lawrence. Any speech that has elements of racism, homophobia, hate or misogyny should be met with the relevant prosecution. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.8% of users find it useful
A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul"

Download file to see previous pages The court case of R.A.V v. city of St. Paul would have revised the definition of the hate speech guided by the provisions of the First Amendment. The court should have convicted the white teenager based on the injury caused by burning a cross in front of a black family’s residence. The act was injurious in nature based on Butler’s argument that any speech or act with elements that imply hate or racism should be prosecuted. The cross was the fighting symbol that the plaintiff used to arouse anger and resentment to the black family. The misdemeanor caused by the white teenager would have been by the trial court for prosecution instead of dismissing the charge.
Butler is convinced that the act of cross burning amounts to hate speech and should not be protected by the constitution. Additionally, the decision by the court to include the provisions of the First Amendment to dismiss the case was irrelevant. The Minnesota court would have ruled in favor of the City of St. Paul instead of dismissing the destructiveness of cross burning (Butler, 2013). The court ruling can be used by racists to conduct heinous act against other community guided by the protection of speech in the constitution. The court decision would have been based on the historical accounts that relate to cross-burning. The act has been used before to carry out racist attacks black families in the United States. Butler established that the court was wrong because it failed to consider past cases of cross burning. She felt that the act itself contained a threat that could be prosecuted in court.
Butler felt that the constitution should have included cross burning in the list of fires (Butler, 2013). The court ruling would have prosecuted the teenager based on the definition of fire in RAV v. St. Paul case. The ruling would pave the way for amendments in the way the constitution protects citizens’ free speech.   ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul Case Study”, n.d.)
A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul Case Study. Retrieved from
(A Response to R.A.V V City of St. Paul Case Study)
A Response to R.A.V V City of St. Paul Case Study.
“A Response to R.A.V V City of St. Paul Case Study”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul

Supreme COurt Kelo v. The city U5

... and unjust. The problem with activist judges is that they undermine our democracy. They are not elected officials and are not responsive to the public. They live in an abstract world where they rarely see the consequences of their actions. Unfortunately, President Obama is keen on selecting more activist judges to sit on the bench of the Supreme Court. Kanner, Gideon. "Kelo v. New London: Bad Law, Bad Policy and Bad Judgment". The Urban Lawyer 38 (2006).... Activist Judges Activist judges are a serious problem in the United s. Instead of simply applying the laws of the land—laws which have been made by duly elected legislators—they choose to apply unsupportable interpretations of the law. This is especially bad when it comes to the...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v Paul David CREWS

...their commitment to excellence in their work that led to justice. Unity and diversity of people on the free exchange of ideas, on learning, living and working harmoniously is truly the pillar of a community’s strength in society as we shall observe in this paper. For the purpose of grasping the whole concept of the case, I will briefly touch on other facets of the case other than those pertaining DNA evaluation. It is the professional unbiased performance of each that slowly but surely led to justice (PLJ, 2012). Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, V Paul David Crews In the morning of September 13, 1990, two hikers, Geoffrey Hood and Molly LaRue, were murdered .The woman tied, raped, and stabbed, resulting to...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

R. Williams Construction Co. v. OSHRC

...? WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION CO. V. OSHRC Introduction The case anchors on the laws and policies of OSHRC – an occupations Health and Security Regulation. The act aims to guarantee employees safety and security while at work. The regulations in the act are implemented to aid reduce the percentage of workstation deaths and injuries. In the Williams construction industry case, the company was subjected to some investigations following the collapse of a trench that caused the death of one worker and acute injuries of another employee. After a serious investigation, the company was charged with some Occupational Safety and Health offences, which lead to expensive penalties. Discussion The paper will investigate the Williams...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

R v Adomako, Law case

...?The case of R. v Adamako case was decided in the House of Lords by a bench composed of Lords Clashfern, Keith of Kinkel, Goff of Chieveley, Browne-Wilkinson and Woolf. This case discussed the offence of involuntary manslaughter whereby a medical practitioner who was supposed to administer anaesthesia to a patient was accused of being negligent in his duties. The appellant while in his duties in treating a patient with an eye ailment failed to notice that an oxygen pipe he had connected during an eye operation had been disconnected resulting in the death of the patient. The jury found him guilty of the offence of manslaughter after which he appealed and the Court of Appeal after which he moved to the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Bluechester City Council v Doncaster Wagons Ltd

...without the paper owner according to JA pye (oxford) Ltd v Graham (2002) UKHL 30 (2003) 1 AC 419. The occupation by the Doncaster Wagon Ltd can be termed as seized if the company gives written acknowledgement to the true owners title. Here in this case as the true owner; Bluechester city council have no title registered, there is no chance of that issue according to the 1980 law. The period of the possession of the land can be calculated from the day of the true owner grants a tenancy or licence to the occupier. In this case this did not happen and in the time being the Bluechester city council made number of objections to Doncaster wagons Ltd to vacate it and because they are...
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study

Otiz v. St. Peter's Case Study

...Otiz v. St. Peters Case Study Number: Introduction Being that only the anesthesia group is accorded the chance to work in a medical facility in an exclusive contract, it is expedient that the partnering parties are aware of the operational guidelines and principles that shape such contracts. Indeed, Oltz v. Peter’s Community Hospital is a case that exemplifies the importance of paying respect to the principles of exclusive contracts. 1. What Parties To a Contract Should Be Aware Of When Negotiating Exclusive Contracts Among other things, for an exclusive contract to stand, the parties involved should factor fully, the scope of services that are to be exclusively provided by the groups....
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper

Mitchell v Glasgow City Council Case

...from Drummond, but still that was not substantial enough to have the local authorities held responsible. Mitchell v Glasgow City council’s case became widely covered on media. The case emanated due to, the Councils failure to facilitate for duty of care. This led to loss of life. All the same there were no valid grounds to have the police liable for having an individual hurt by third part even despite the claims aired. Mitchell’s family brought claims against their local authorities since; they felt that their housing authority breached their agreement to facilitate for a proper duty of care to them. The court dismissed the first claim in 2005 whereby the Mitchell family sought an...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

R v Hayter [2005]

...R v Hayter Introduction This work deals with an analysis of the case R V Hayter. In this regard, relevant legal principles relating to the issue of confession have been examined. Procedural and legal issues in the case have been scrutinised. In addition, opinions of the judges and evidentiary principles have been discussed. With the rejection of the appeal to the House of Lords, in R v Hayter, it was clearly established that the confession of a defendant could be admitted as evidence against a co – defendant in a jointly tried criminal case. The reasoning behind this common law principle is that a confession is evidence only against the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Jacob Bradley v. City of Lynn

...Jacob Bradley v. of Lynn Case Jacob Bradley v. of Lynn Case The case between Jacob Bradley versusthe City of Lynn highlights various issues that occur in the hiring process of workers. Moreover, the case helps in pointing out various aspects that make it impossible for some of the people to get jobs. The plaintiff is opposed to the cognitive ability examination as it is seen as discrimination towards getting a job (Case3.5). In ruling, the court notes that the examination had a negative impact on employment of Black and Hispanic candidates. The selection process was also noted as not being job related. In this paper, I will offer my opinion on the ruling and the hiring process as well as the possible judgment in an ethical manner... ...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

First nation studies - R. V. Sparrow case

...Advancement of Anishinabe rights in Canada: Gains and costs The court case of R. V. Sparrow helped the cause of advancement of Anishinabe rights in Canada that led to specific gains and costs paid for the same. Initiation of court case The court case was initiated by the Musqueam band member, Ronald Sparrow who was arrested for the cause of fishing with a net which was deemed to be longer than what was permitted to him as per his fishing license. The respondent of this court case of British Columbia was Her Majesty The Queen. Basis of claim in the court case The claim for this court case was filed on the basis of the Section 35 of 1982 Constitution Act which was passed by the government of Canada. The...
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic A Response to R.A.V v City of St. Paul for FREE!

Contact Us