Download file to see previous pages...
This paper compares and contrasts the two plans.
Virginia plan proposed a congress with two houses or chambers namely lower house and upper house and each state to be represented depending on its size and population. On the other hand, New Jersey plan proposed single chamber legislature (unicameral) where every state represents one vote without considering the size and population.
Virginia plan proposed that one chamber of the legislature have a representative elected by the people. It also suggested that the state legislature to nominate members of the second chamber. However, New Jersey Plan did not propose how congress members are selected.
Virginia plan proposed that members elected by the people serve for three year terms and the other house elected by state legislatures serve for seven years. On the other hand, New Jersey plan did not propose the length of terms of service for the legislative branch.
Virginia plan proposed that state members be based on the population of the states. Hence, bigger states were to have more state members than smaller ones. On the other hand, New Jersey plan proposed that states be treated equally with each having the same number of members.
Virginia plan proposed executive and national judiciary to have power to veto legislation that was subject to override and a national veto power over any state legislation. It also gave legislative branch powers to negate state laws, which were incompatible with the articles of the union. On the other hand, New Jersey plan proposed congress to have more powers of making laws and take precedence over state law. It also proposed congress to have more powers of setting and forcing the collection of taxes.
In both plans, the federal government and states work together and relates in different aspects. For instance, they both proposed federal government to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The Constitution of 1787 laid the groundwork for the newly established United States government.The principles, in terms of government, established in the Constitution have remained pivotal elements of the United States over two hundred years after it was established.
Lacking coercive authority, Congress entirely depended upon monetary hand-outs from the states, which at that time refused the Congress requests to be financed (McClellan 1-2).
Congress at this time was totally bogged down
According to the study, while the two plans agree on the number of branches of government, i.e. the Legislature, the Judiciary and the Executive, the composition and the jurisdiction of the three arms of government differ in the two plans. The Virginia plan supports the creation of national branches of government, with national jurisdiction.
Randolph and the New Jersey plan by Mr. Patterson. Mr. Patterson proposed a government with different branches. According to him, the U.S Federal government should include the Congress, which preserves the
Both propose that the national government comprise of three branches: the legislature or congress, the executive and judiciary. The national legislature (Congress) was to consist of two branches: the senate and the lower house but both were representatives of the
There would be two houses in the legislative branch. States with larger populations would have more representatives than the smaller states. These would include the Upper House and the Lower House. The Lower House would be
The United States of America has 50 states, and New Jersey is one of them. New Jersey is a small northeastern state with some 209 kilometers of Atlantic coastline. New Jersey has 21 counties. Many of New Jersey counties are considered part of New York City and metropolitan area. Gov. Philip Carteret organized New Jersey as an English colony.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Compare and contrast the Virginia and New Jersey plans presented at the Constitutional Convention for FREE!