Nobody downloaded yet

Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
His military methods have influenced European models. Rules of engagement are military directives for combating opposing sides. As observed from the Vietnam War of 1945-1975, poor designation…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.5% of users find it useful
Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command"

Download file to see previous pages The implementation of the rule of engagement led him to victories as his attacks were effectively launched. The chain of command broke down responsibilities based on the allocation of specific responsibilities at each position. In addition, each official reported to the one above them (Bevin, 2014). It shows the flow of duties through ranks, from the commander in chief of the armed forces to the individual soldiers in the field. The rules of engagement define the conduct of opposing sides in a war situation
Napoleon’s military had individual soldiers in the field who executed decisions made by senior persons in authority. They were the junior most officials of his military. They formed the basis of every attack. Their fundamental task was going out to the battlefield and fighting their opponents. They focused on defeating their enemies in the shortest span of time. The process involved employing tactical methodologies and strategies in launching their attacks to force the opponents do things against their own will. This has always been the fundamental goal of any war (Greene, 2007). The attacks would be organized in troops that had adopted a policy that involved ambushing supply columns.
The military had battalion commanders who would execute command from division commanders. The battalion commanders were second lowest in command. They directed orders to the soldiers in the field, who are a fundamental group to any military unit. They would mentor and coach their subordinate staff officers and company commanders. They would be involved in giving morale, enthusiasm in their organizations and training. This would eventually boost their performance at war and consequently lead them to victories. The battalion was capable of independent missions and operations of a specific period of time and scope
The military had division commanders who would receive orders from the general. They directed their orders to the battalion commanders. They ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command Essay”, n.d.)
Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command Essay. Retrieved from
(Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command Essay)
Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command Essay.
“Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Essay on topic Conventional Wars, Rules of Engagement, Chain of Command for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us