Download file to see previous pages...
An analysis of Lincoln’s speech concerning the controversial Kansas-Nebraska act and the antislavery constitution by Frederick Douglass will highlight the views of proslavery and antislavery.
In 1854, Lincoln gave his reaction to the opinion of Douglass who had introduced the Kansas-Nebraska act (Johnson 266-267). Abraham Lincoln presented his speech at Peoria. The bill drafted by Douglass, the Illinois senator sought to discredit the Missouri compromise. The bill sparked a heated controversy in the house. After Douglass had expressed his views for three hours, it was time for Lincoln to respond. Lincoln’s speech traced all the preceding events that contributed to the debate that they were handling. He presented an account of the Missouri compromise and its implications to Nebraska. He mentioned that Nebraska had belonged to the region defined in the Missouri compromise and any inhabitants occupying the regions could not practice slavery. He then detailed the ways in which Douglass’s suggestions in the Kansas-Nebraska bill affected the Missouri compromise. He mentioned that the bill allowed inhabitants of the Nebraska region to practice slavery if they deemed it right to do so. This suggestion by Douglass contradicted with the Missouri compromise. In addition, Lincoln highlighted Douglass’s expansion plans of splitting the controversial regions and introducing Kansas as new territory.
After outlining a brief history of the issue, Lincoln progressed to present his anti-slavery views. According to him, the Negroes were equally human and deserved a fair chance in the government as well (268). He objected Douglass’s views that only the whites had a right to form the government. He detailed the evils of slavery inn different states and made his antislavery message to Douglass and the audience very clear. His speech presents the reader with an opportunity to delve deeper into the issues defining slavery in the American
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
However, according to Chrestien (103), the origin of the first man in the U.S is closely associated with the Indians. The history in the textbooks and classrooms today largely constitutes images received from movies, legends and childhood stories that are sometimes inaccurate.
It, however, only explains the changes that had occurred and not the reasons for the advent of these changes and who provoked them or why they were so inevitable by the end of the 19th century. By the end of the twentieth century, people who were living in America but formed a minority realized and retaliated over the fact that they needed better reforms and better welfare.
By relying on the existing primary and secondary sources on the historical background of the United States of America, it is evident that, the modern social, political, economic, and environmental development is to a greater extent shaped by the countries past occurrences.
Primary sources provide the 21st century reader with first hand information concerning the American history. The book presents a documentation of such primary sources so that the future generations have a point of reference when studying the history of ancient America.
As far the suggestion for recommending Information 'Technology for developing countries, the answer is indicated as "YES " and detailed justification appended to the statement. A detailed example is quoted for better appreciation of the Paper. The Paper concludes with a recommendation for implementation of Information Technology.
The article provides very crucial revelations about democracy that at the time was rare in many countries.
The American system of voting using the majority and the college was in existence at this time. These institutions, however, not so developed as in contrast to today,
Ballet is currently being taught in many schools as part of the normal curriculum so as to equip the students with creative abilities owing to the fact that the dance requires long period of training and practice in order
However, housewifery can be compared to the recently concluded chapter of slavery in the United States of America. One reason behind this opposition is the fact that there is no minimum wage law for women working