Download file to see previous pages...
Suspects of terrorism are expected to provide the government with intelligence information on the whereabouts of their gangs, sympathizers and financiers. However, to extract this information from them always become the problem. This is because most of these suspects are under oath to protect the activities of their groups. For example, most of them opt to commit suicide rather than having to be interrogated by the authorities. Concealing this information, therefore, renders a big blow to governments counter-terrorism activities. Proposals have for this reason been forwarded encouraging governments to use more force on the suspects and this involves the application of torture to the suspects. This, however, has human rights implications besides the expected outcomes. This means that in the face of the society, the human rights organizations and the international community, torturing terrorism suspects have pros and cons.
Applying torture to terrorism suspects have advantages. First, torture to terrorism suspects has not been covered in the Geneva Convention report on the treatment of prisoners of war. Further, the convention only prohibits torture in the culprits own soil. When happening in another country, torture is thus legally acceptable. Secondly, treating terrorism with diplomacy only makes the situation worse. When the dignity of the suspects is respected as proposed by humanitarian organizations the terrorists are even more encouraged to make attacks. In addition, new members have no reproach joining the terror groups. This is as opposed to a torture situation in which case even those who have the intentions of joining such groups become discouraged. This slowly weakens the group and makes it unable to conduct attacks in future. Thirdly, the fight against terrorism often requires the people to make a choice between two evils. To use torture to compel disclosure of intelligent information,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It should be noted that Hindu dominated countries like India also aligned with America in their struggle against war on terror. War on terror is perceived by many Muslims as the war against their culture and beliefs. In any case it is a fact that 9/11 incident has created many changes in the global political and sociological spectrums.
These violent extremist groups were seen as a threat to the American way of life and national security. While most of the country had asked that the war in Afghanistan be ended and the troops deployed there be recalled, Obama argued that doing so would leave Afghanistan vulnerable to extremist elements and allow groups like the Al Qaeda and Taliban to take control of the country and once again, pose a threat to their national security.
That is why computer companies work very hard to secure my personal information. In the wrong hands, it could be a potentially life threatening situation for me. That is why I do not believe that the government, the FBI in particular should be given access to my personal information without my consent.
The New York state law is a strong advocate of Sexual harassment at workplace. These policies are created as state model and they are wider enough to cover issues beyond behavior based on characteristics. New York State laws starting from Law No. 10 to Law No.18 all deal with the different bullying aspects that can possibly be constructed in any form (Stop Bullying Goverment, 2002).
While media reporting is fundamental to the creation of an informed society, there are various aspects of media reporting that may end up portraying a subject for what it is not. The issue of Islam and the Islam- Christian relationship is one of the subjects that have been marred by stereotyping and misrepresentations, thus creating a general fear of Islam religion among the non-Muslims (Woodhead, kawanami & Partridge, 2009).
Consequently, attendances of agents to Mosque will be dependent on the approval of warrants by courts as stipulated in the USA Patriot Act 2005 (Foster, 2006), within the limits of the Fourth Amendments of the Constitution (Emerson and Haber, 1952). So, the need to prevent or thwart needless deaths through terrorism by covert surveillance similar to the one initiated by Reagan in 1984 under the National Security Decision Directive 138 (Celmer, 1987) of the Arab population should be driven by the upheld of the first Amendment and the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution which protects the civil liberties of the people of the United States of America in as much as these people are citizens of
Is force a useful security tool when combating terrorism?
It is a fact that the world powers have played their vital part at combating terrorism in one way or the other but they have been largely unsuccessful at creating a much needed difference - a difference which will eventually stabilize the whole world when it comes to facing the threats which terrorism poses on an out and out basis.
Terrorist attacks can cause repercussions on human psychology despite the location where it strikes. The impact of such activity is not limited within any boundary and can have repercussions all across the globe. The
This is the belief that one’s safety and survival is a responsibility of one’s self and not entirely other people’s (Lee 17). Amanda reckons that we experience disasters in unique ways alongside our identical basic reactions we all harbor.
Since the company mainly deals in mortgages, a deterioration of the same would mean little or no market for this company. The Canadian government’s strive to keep the company afloat may only go as far as assisting the company to meet its
2 Pages(500 words)Article
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Article on topic Torturing terrorist by the goverment for FREE!