Download file to see previous pages...
With increase in the cost of life, it is apparent that paying for medical cover is to some extend seen as a luxury especially by middle class people. The budget on how to spend the earnings has been difficult characterized by large budgets and loans that act as a burden to many people. Besides, it is only logical that one cannot pay for medical cover and forfeit their meals. Groszkruger (2011) argued that the government should put in place mechanisms that allow its citizens to be flexible in the way they carry on with their lives. For instance, instead of the government introducing a healthcare program and then impose some policies that compels people to part with money, it would have been better if the government came up with proposals that would help people that are unable to pay for the plan to get the funds. For instance, a section of the national budget should be set aside to pay for those people that are unable to pay.
In a different dimension, the law to tax people if they fail to pay for the plan can be argued to be oppressive because it is the right for people to get free medical help from the government. In fact, according to Wolfe (2012) the government should not bring in the issue of taxing social amenities that are considered fundamental to its people. Instead, there should be funds obtained through other means in taking care of healthcare of the Americans. The plan and other social policies should be outlined in such a way that the Americans can only contribute small amounts to aid the running of the institutions put in place.
In regard to solving the issue of lack of money to pay for the coverage, the Obamacare proposes that one can obtain financial help to pay for the coverage. Although one would be made to believe that this is a solution, it is only seen as so on the basis of paying for the coverage. In fact, this could be argued to mean digging a hole to obtain soil
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The 2010 Health care reform has created and changed existing health care policies to improve the health care delivery. The health care system in the United States is a mixture of private and public insurance programs. The need for a reform is highlighted by the fact that nearly one fifth of the population of United States lack health insurance.
This is one political mistake that he many never recover from. If we are to look at the track record of his predecessors in relation to their own healthcare reform programs, we will see that they did not fare any better on their own versions of public healthcare coverage.
Future developments and ideas continue to be projected with famous arguments comprising of a single-payer scheme and a decrease in fee-for-service medical care. The PPACA comprises of a new agency, Medicaid Innovation and the Center for Medicare, which are intended to investigate reform ideas by pilot projects (Christensen & Grossman, 2011).
It was signed by president Barrack Obama on 23 March 2010, also known as ‘Obamacare’ (Jacobs & Skocpol, 2012). The primary focus of Patient Protection and Affordable Act is to increase standard and affordability of healthcare facilities for the public.
Now that the bill has been signed into law, many people are wondering, what will the future actually look like Will sick people still be turned away from insurance companies Is the beginning of privatization of the health care industry going to shut down the competitiveness of insurance companies What is the future of health care in America This piece seeks to address some of those questions in detail.
forms was to make sure that the coverage would be adequate and affordable, this necessitates residents to obtain health insurance that does not provide minimal financial protection (Long 2008). The goals of the health reform are explicitly defined as: to have expanded coverage,
Also, effects on other aspects of the health care system have been addressed.
High quality palliative care could be provided by focusing on the individual, and forming partnerships between the individual, service provider, family
Harrington and Estes (2000) blame poor healthcare system for the limited accessibility to services by under-privileged who are uninsured. Thus, President Obama’s healthcare reforms have been hailed as major initiatives which would address the
behavioral health centers) and post-acute, rehabilitation and end-of-life care. However the U.S. healthcare system is highly fragmented and inefficient. The country spends more on health care than any other
Health care is a fundamental human right of every human being and increasing the expenses may lockout some individuals from getting the required medical help needed and this may lead to unnecessary deaths. Health care becomes a preserve for the rich and powerful since they are the only ones who can afford such high rates.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Healthcare Reform (I Oppose It) for FREE!