Nobody downloaded yet

Product Liability Case - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Product liability cases have in recent years seen a significant increase, especially in terms of injuries filed in court by people who, despite undergoing minimally invasive surgery, develop serious cartilage damage. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.7% of users find it useful
Product Liability Case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Product Liability Case"

Download file to see previous pages However, she was subsequently diagnosed shoulder chondrolysis that caused her shoulder socket and ball to fuse, severely restricting shoulder motion. As a result, she filed a product liability suit against I-Flow Corp, which manufactured the “PainBuster” device. In this case, she asserted that the device had not received FDA approval for use in such cases, arguing the product’s manufacturer was liable for the sale of this product despite not giving adequate warning and was, therefore, unreasonably dangerous (Moylan, 2015). There is no mention of the insurance company in the article, which might be explained by the fact the case was initially thrown out and the insurance company was not needed.
The Courts of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that, for medical devices, negligence of instruction was grounds for product liability, stating that this finding was not in contravention of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 or the underlying intent of the US Congress in making these amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act (Moylan, 2015). The suspected reason for Christina’s disorder was a “pain pump” that her doctors used to directly administer painkillers to her shoulder joint following the surgical procedure. Normally, this device is used to deliver different types of pain medications to the surgery site quickly and directly. However, the procedure involved in using the device has been linked to development of chondrolysis, which is a debilitating condition of the joints. This disorder causes the depletion of cartilage that separates and connects bones and, as a result, the joints become fused and lose all mobility. In majority of cases, the discovery and diagnosis of this condition happens too late for any effective treatment or cure (Moylan, 2015).
Before submitting her product liability case to court, Christina requested the court to instruct the jury on the negligence theory per se. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Product Liability Case Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Product Liability Case Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1697846-product-liability-case
(Product Liability Case Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Product Liability Case Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/business/1697846-product-liability-case.
“Product Liability Case Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1697846-product-liability-case.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Product Liability Case

Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers

...?Product Liability: The Case of Cigarette Manufacturers Introduction: Product liability refers to an area of law according to which different business manufacturing companies; distributing agencies, suppliers, as well as the retailers are held accountable in front of the local courts if the products or services they are offering to the public inflict injuries or are injurious to their health. Strictly on legal terms, the product liability refers to a particular situation. When some people or an individual are injured or harmed by a product which they consider as unsafe to the society in...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Product Liability Suit - The Case of Toyota

...? Product Liability Suit: The Recall Case of Toyota Company Texas A&M - Commerce In partial fulfillment of the requirements for MGT 590 Lloyd M. Basham April 12, 2012 Table of Contents Abstract 3 Introduction 4 The History of Development and Innovations 5 The Case of Car Recalls - What went wrong? 6 The Actions Taken 8 Impact of the Recall Incident 10 Conclusion 11 References 13 Appendices 15 Abstract With the fast growing world economy, the production is also intensified to meet the consumer’s ever-changing demands. It is imperative that products must comply with safety and quality standards to establish reputation and considerably...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Product Liability and Intentional Tort

...?Hypothetical Issues on Product Liability and Intentional Tort Hypothetic Product liability issues in the case Chase’s hypothetic case of injury by the paper shredding machine within the work place touches on whether Chase should be compensated for personal injuries caused by the machine. Product liability law is a division of tort law which seeks to a cause of action against the product’s manufacturer, seller or designer in situations where a person is injured by the product. Over the years, product liability law has shifted the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Case Study on Liability for Supply Defective Product

...? Case Study on Liability for Supply of Defective Product Question ISSUE Whether Paul Price is en d to claim damages for the defective product under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 as amended by the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994? Is the Exclusion clause limiting the liability will be of any help to Tefal? RULE In UK, the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994 states that the buyers have the privilege to anticipate that the products that they purchase are: Possessing an adequate quality Suitable for all planned purposes. Paul Price has the right to demand a full refund from the retailer from whom he bought the Tefal Actifrys provided an...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim

...?Running Head: PRODUCT LIABILITY LAW SUITS Product Liability Lawsuits: Boehringer Ingelheim Insert Insert Grade Insert 10 June 2012 Introduction Product liability lawsuits make manufacturers of goods compensate consumers in case their goods and products become defective. This means that when unsafe products harm an individual, he may have a cause of action against the manufacturer, the person who designed it or the seller. In the United States, for instance, product liability suits are effective tools for consumer protection. The product...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Warranties and Product Liability

...injury must have privity of contract with the negligent manufacturer. The MacPherson rule extends to "those third parties who are in the vicinity of probable use" (JSTOR Org. 1940, p.163). But in the case of biscuits from China that are laced with formalin, the victims of such cannot sue for damages on the basis of negligence but on the tort of fraud if there is premeditated disguising of the Warranties 7 product as contained in its label as free from any harmful contaminant. This is fraudulent misrepresentation that makes the manufacturer liable. The concept of strict...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Product Safety and Product Liability

.... The Rome II regulations, though credited for opening up trans-border trade, have also been a source of criticism for the uncertainties they have caused in respect to the choice of law applicable in trans-border product liability cases. The dominant view in this argument is that the Rome II regulations on product liabilities invade the “country of origin” principle that was more customized to allow the growth of business. Instead, the Rome II Regulation adopt the “country of reception” principle which is damaging to the security of business in the E.U.2 this paper will therefore look at the problems producers and businesses may face in respect of the...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Product Liability

...Product Liability The U.S Companies should be liable. The companies should have the responsibility of ensuring their products are safe. They must be held liable for placing products with defects knowing very well they will be used by individuals. This happens for the company fails to carry out the required inspections to ensure all products do not have defects. Anyone that allows the product to be available in the market without proper investigations on the products is held liable if they cause any injury or damage to consumers. The companies will be held liable since the release of the product to the market shows high levels of negligence and lack of consumer protection. Since the retailers utilize raw ingredients yet they know... that they...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Product Liability Lawsuit against Toyota

...to the defective part of vehicle. The second part was proven from the Lexus incidence was actually became a fact so the whole law suits are basically based on other two points. According to product liability law, the Toyota motors were left with one of the two options to claim in this case. They can either prove that the accident was due to some other cause and not because of the deflected part of the car. The other claim that can be made is that the injury was prior to the accident and was caused by some other factors rather than car accident. This seems to be the latest strategy in the defense of company. For example, in the start of this year during one of the law suits, they showed...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Ford Pinto Product Liability Case

...on a specific accident. In contrast, the risk/benefit analysis the defendant used in discarding the safer design required a whole examination of the product’s costs, risks and benefits when under use. Thus, the lower court found the organization guilty of negligence in designing the fuel tank of the Ford Pinto car. Consequently, the product liability that was found against Ford Motor Company in its Ford Pinto product was both design defect failure to warn. Indeed, the nature of the case reveals that the organization was guilty of design defect instead of manufacturing defect or failure to warn. This is because the manufacturing defect is incurred when a...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Product Liability Case for FREE!

Contact Us