Download file to see previous pages
The tools used in the analysis include dominant economic features, driving force analysis, strategic group map, PESTLE and competitive analysis framework.
The main issue under discussion is on product reliability based on the products and consumer perception. The company has issues with quality assurance and lack of quality control system. According to the consumer reports of 2009, there were numerous recalls of GM products due to reliability. Therefore, the paper comes up with three alternatives to curb the issue on reliability. The first alternative to curb the issue is coming up with an automated checking mechanism that will check any product’s defect. The alternative is important because it will ensure that no defects goes unchecked (General Motors, 1980). Some of the defects that the automation process will check includes faults with seat belts, brakes, and other important areas. On the other hand, the alternative though helpful is very expensive and requires a lot of structures and capital to put up.
Another alternative to curb the issues on quality control is that the company need to set up certified auditors who will carry out random and frequent check up on the company’s product. The auditor need to come up with routine reports on the manufacturing process and the equipment used during the process. The advantage of this alternative is that the company will make sure that their quality control systems are up to date and efficient. One of the cons of this alternative is that there are tendencies that the company might ignore the reports and recommendations from the certified auditor. Citing claims that the recommendations are expensive to implement (General Motors, 1981).
The third alternative to curb the issue is recalling all the vehicles that have default issues. Recalling the vehicle will ensure that the company beefs up quality control issues. Recalling the vehicle will give the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Front end of General Motors company Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1689572-front-end-of-general-motors-company
(Front End of General Motors Company Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Front End of General Motors Company Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/business/1689572-front-end-of-general-motors-company.
Each of the approaches has shown significant weaknesses on the side of the aforementioned company, especially when it comes to its financial standing. As the company loses much money, it may not be able to train the semiskilled and unskilled people of the developing nation.
SWOT analysis of the company will also be analyzed, and recommendations made on how the company can work to improve its current position. Business Overview of Hyundai Heavy Industry Co. Ltd Hyundai Motor Group is the second largest automaker company in Asia following Toyota and the fourth largest in the world.
The technique has been recognized as the controlling tool of the business operations within GM. It contributes to the control of manufacturing along with labor costs during the production process.Lean manufacturing can be well described as a compound approach aiming at the reduction of wastes, coordination with supply chain and creation of close collaboration with customers
The UAW has made, and continues to make, substantial concessions in regards to their rate of pay in an effort to compromise with management and contain costs during this period of economic uncertainty. Recent actions at GM have been responsible for additional savings, and they would like to get their labor costs down into the $50 range, only marginally higher than the $49 paid by Toyota and Honda, which are widely believed to be the gold standard for autoworker compensation packages.
Canada is another big centre of its facilities where GM operates through 20 locations. It is headquartered in Detroit, Michigan and employs about 335,000 people. The brands include Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, GM Daewoo, Holden, Hummer, Opel, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn and Vauxhall.
The automobile industry was always competitive. Moreover the globalization and other global happenings necessitated the companies to think beyond the traditional way of doing business. The change in overall structure of the organization based on the market structure can give better result.
Born in Detroit Michigan in 1910 General engines has delivered a steady of vehicles, for example, Chevrolet, Pontiac Cadillac, and Buick which have ended up family unit names in the U.s. As being what is indicated, the General Motors Brand is decently established in America as well as all through the world.
GM Motors manufactures and distributes a number of brands ranging from Chevrolet to Cadillac. Besides, the company conducts business with commercial fleet customers, governments, and leasing companies where it offers its
Sky West Inc. has achieved success in the airline industry as demonstrated in the qualitative and quantitative strategy of the company where it 2009 it earned 41.25% of revenue between the five largest U.S.
Since sub cultural differences are the main cause of employee dissatisfaction and consequential turnover, the management should strongly focus on finding a solution to the differences. Particularly, it is important to evaluate how they are beneficial to the company and how they adversely affect employees.
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the case study on your topic
"Front end of General Motors company"
with a personal 20% discount.